Charman v. Capital Projects LLC et al
Plaintiff: Thane Charman
Defendant: Capital Projects LLC, Christian Reinartson, John Doe and Christian Reinertson
Case Number: 3:2022cv01201
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael S Berg
Referring Judge: Jinsook Ohta
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Christian Reinertson. (Javitch, Mark) (exs).
September 6, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thane Charman. Capital Projects LLC served. (Javitch, Mark) (exs).
August 30, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued on Amended Complaint. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (alns). (jms). (Main Document 5 replaced on 8/31/2022) (alns).
August 28, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Capital Projects LLC, John Doe, Christian Reinertson, filed by Thane Charman.New Summons Requested. (Javitch, Mark) (exs).
August 16, 2022 Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (sjt).
August 16, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (sjt).
August 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Capital Projects LLC, John Doe, Christian Reinartson ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17083671.) Filed by Tane Charman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1201-JO-MSB. Judge Jinsook Ohta and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Javitch, Mark)(cxl1) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charman v. Capital Projects LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thane Charman
Represented By: Mark Louis Javitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital Projects LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christian Reinartson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christian Reinertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?