Durant v. Gupta Evans & Ayres, PC et al
| John Durant |
| Gupta Evans & Ayres, PC, Ajay Gupta and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2022cv01227 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Todd W Robinson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Durant, as to Gupta Evans & Ayres, PC. (Higbee, Mathew) (fth). |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Durant, as to Ajay Gupta. (Higbee, Mathew) (fth). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by John Durant. No Parties With Financial Interest. (cxl1) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ajay Gupta, Does 1 through 10, Gupta Evans & Ayres, PC ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17096282.) Filed by John Durant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-D) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2022: #3 Copyright Report) [Copyright Report Mailed] The new case number is 3:22-cv-1227-TWR-KSC. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Higbee, Mathew) (cxl1). (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
