Chappell v. McDowell et al
| Deshawn Chappell |
| N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez, E. Davis, F. Aguilar, A.W.P. Messerli, Y. Touchton, F. Nago, V. Ayala-Herrera, J. Gonzales, C. Martinez, G. Gasgonia, R. Johnson, M. Ortega, H. Pelayo, J. Rocha, C. Barrera, G. Ephion, Armando Lopez, P. Messerli, G. Balbuena, S. Duran, A. Dohoda, E. Nunez, J. Wells, J. Montgomery, S. Cardenas and S. Gonzales |
| 3:2022cv01241 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| John A Houston |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against F. Aguilar, V. Ayala-Herrera, G. Balbuena, C. Barrera, S. Cardenas, E. Davis, A. Dohoda, S. Duran, G. Ephion, G. Gasgonia, J. Gonzales, S. Gonzales, R. Johnson, Armando Lopez, S. Lopez, C. Martinez, N. McDowell, A.W.P. Messerli, P. Messerli, J. Montgomery, F. Nago, E. Nunez, N. Nunez, M. Ortega, H. Pelayo, J. Rocha, Y. Touchton, J. Wells (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP not filed.), filed by Deshawn Chappell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhib B-D, #3 Exhib E-F, #4 Exhib G-I, #5 Supplemental Exhibits)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1241-JAH-NLS. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
