Morrison v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
| Valerie Morrison |
| Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01276 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| M James Lorenz |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1453 Class Action Fairness Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Valerie Morrison with prejudice (Fitzgerald, Jack) (cxl1). |
Filing 16
Order Granting Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Amend Complaint (ECF No. #15 ). The deadline for Plaintiffs to amend the Complaint is 12/2/22. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 11/25/22. (jmo)
|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #14 Notice (Other) by Valerie Morrison. (Joseph, Paul) (fth). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF INTENT TO AMEND COMPLAINT by Valerie Morrison re #13 Motion to Dismiss (Joseph, Paul) (fth). |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Dixon, Robert) Modified to correct event on 11/4/2022 (sjt). |
| Filing 12 PRO HAC APPROVED: Jenna Smith appearing for Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (no document attached) (jrm) |
| Filing 11 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17233654.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Smith, Jenna) |
| Filing 10 PRO HAC APPROVED: Jane M. Metcalf appearing for Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (no document attached) (jrm) |
| Filing 9 PRO HAC APPROVED: Steven A. Zalesin appearing for Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (no document attached) (jrm) |
| Filing 8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17229665.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Metcalf, Jane) |
| Filing 7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17229661.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Zalesin, Steven) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint. The deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to November 3, 2022. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 10/5/2022. (fth)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dixon, Robert)Attorney Robert Kenneth Dixon added to party Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.(pty:dft) QC Mailer - Proposed orders should not be attached (fth). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Valerie Morrison. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. served. (Flynn, Trevor) (fth). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge M. James Lorenz for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22cv1276-L-RBB.(no document attached) (ddf) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mef)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-17120088.), filed by Valerie Morrison. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Consumers Legal Remedies Act Venue Affidavit)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1276-BEN-RBB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Fitzgerald, Jack)(mef)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
