Cairns v. Singer et al
| Nigel Cairns |
| Peter Singer, Gregory Pollock, Cynthia Aaron, Joan Irion and Truc Do |
| 3:2022cv01283 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Janis L. Sammartino is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22CV01283-CAB-KSC. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/6/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(alns) (jms).
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cynthia Aaron, Truc Do, Joan Irion, Gregory Pollock, Peter Singer ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CAS140189.), filed by Nigel Cairns. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1283-JLS-KSC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Cairns, Nigel)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
