Ritelli et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
| Adrio Ritelli and Angelica Ritelli |
| Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC |
| 3:2022cv01314 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Linda Lopez |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation And Case Management Video Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 9/27/2022.(ddf)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC.(Wolf, Matthew)Attorney Matthew C. Wolf added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:dft) (ddf). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17133695.), filed by Adrio Ritelli. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1314-LL-MDD. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (McMillan, Julian)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
