Cranton v. Grossmont Hospital Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Jacquelyn Cranton
Defendant: Grossmont Hospital Corporation and Does 1 through 50
Case Number: 3:2022cv01315
Filed: September 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
2 Judge: Janis L Sammartino
3 Judge: Bernard G Skomal
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Vacating Hearing and Taking #11 Motion to Remand to State Court Under Submission on the Papers without Oral Argument Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/27/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf)
October 27, 2022 Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Jacquelyn Cranton. (Puche, Sergio) (tcf).
October 20, 2022 Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court Defendant Grossmont Hospital Corporation's MPA in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to State Court filed by Grossmont Hospital Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice)(Landry, Jody) (tcf).
October 20, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Siobhan Anne Marie Cullen on behalf of Grossmont Hospital Corporation (Cullen, Siobhan)Attorney Siobhan Anne Marie Cullen added to party Grossmont Hospital Corporation(pty:dft) (tcf).
September 30, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Jacquelyn Cranton. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice)(Puche, Sergio) (tcf).
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE. Case reassigned to Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin for all further proceedings. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo, Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:22-cv-00443-JLS-MDD. The new case number is 22-cv-01315-JLS-MDD.Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 9/15/2022. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/15/2022.(exs)
September 8, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Grossmont Hospital Corporation of case(s) 22-cv-00443-JLS-MDD . (Weaver, Krystal) (anh).
September 8, 2022 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22cv1315-CAB-BGS.(no document attached) (ddf)
September 6, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sergio Julian Puche on behalf of Jacquelyn Cranton (Puche, Sergio)Attorney Sergio Julian Puche added to party Jacquelyn Cranton(pty:pla) (ddf).
September 6, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Aparajit Bhowmik on behalf of Jacquelyn Cranton (Bhowmik, Aparajit) (ddf).
September 6, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Scott Herman on behalf of Jacquelyn Cranton (Herman, Jeffrey)Attorney Jeffrey Scott Herman added to party Jacquelyn Cranton(pty:pla) (ddf).
September 2, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Grossmont Hospital Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, . Identifying Corporate Parent Grossmont Hospital Corporation, Other Affiliate Jacquelyn Cranton for Grossmont Hospital Corporation. (Weaver, Krystal) (alns).
September 2, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Grossmont Hospital Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Sharp Healthcare for Grossmont Hospital Corporation.. (Weaver, Krystal)(alns).
September 2, 2022 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Grossmont Hospital Corporation. (sjt)
September 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17133112). Filed by Grossmont Hospital Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Declaration of Rachel Davis, #4 Declaration of Jody Landry)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1315-BEN-BGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(sjt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cranton v. Grossmont Hospital Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacquelyn Cranton
Represented By: Aparajit Bhowmik
Represented By: Kyle R. Nordrehaug
Represented By: Nicholas James De Blouw
Represented By: Norman B Blumenthal
Represented By: Jeffrey Scott Herman
Represented By: Sergio Julian Puche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grossmont Hospital Corporation
Represented By: Jody A Landry
Represented By: Krystal Norris Weaver
Represented By: Siobhan Anne Marie Cullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?