Frederick v. Perrigo Company
Plaintiff: Chelsea Frederick
Defendant: Perrigo Company
Case Number: 3:2022cv01333
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: William V Gallo
Referring Judge: M James Lorenz
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Of Dismissal [ECF No. #10 ]. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 10/25/2022.(ddf)
October 24, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chelsea Frederick Without Prejudice (Fitzgerald, Jack) (ddf).
October 4, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT by Chelsea Frederick re #4 Summons Returned Executed filed by Chelsea Frederick . (Flynn, Trevor) (fth).
September 13, 2022 Filing 8 PRO HAC APPROVED: Christian W. Harben appearing for Plaintiff Chelsea Frederick (no document attached) (jrm)
September 13, 2022 Filing 7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17161333.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Harben, Christian)
September 13, 2022 Filing 6 PRO HAC APPROVED: Sidney W. Jackson, III appearing for Plaintiff Chelsea Frederick (no document attached) (jrm)
September 13, 2022 Filing 5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17161264.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Jackson, Sidney)
September 13, 2022 Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN PER #9 NOTICE*** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chelsea Frederick. Perrigo Company served. (Flynn, Trevor) (fth). Modified on 10/5/2022 (fth).
September 6, 2022 Filing 3 DECLARATION re #1 Complaint, Consumers Legal Remedies Act Venue Affidavit by Plaintiff Chelsea Frederick. (Fitzgerald, Jack) (fth).
September 6, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (rmc).
September 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Perrigo Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17139682.), filed by Chelsea Frederick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1333-L-WVG. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Fitzgerald, Jack)(cxl1) (rmc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frederick v. Perrigo Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsea Frederick
Represented By: Caroline S. Emhardt
Represented By: Jack Fitzgerald
Represented By: Melanie Rae Persinger
Represented By: Paul K. Joseph
Represented By: Trevor Matthew Flynn
Represented By: Christian W. Harben
Represented By: Sidney W. Jackson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Perrigo Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?