French v. Mitchell
Plaintiff: Kristopher G. French
Defendant: J. Mitchell
Case Number: 3:2022cv01355
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael M Anello
Referring Judge: Allison H Goddard
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)[IFP packet mailed to Plaintiff] (tcf)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. No. #3 ]; and Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint and Summons Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) & FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/3/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service and order mailed to Kathleen Allison.)(tcf)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(smy1)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting, from Plaintiff Kristopher G. French. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) exceed the page limitations set by S.D. Cal. CivLR 8.2(a) and S.D. Cal. General Order 653A, but include a Motion to Exceed page limitations and/or Motion for Emergency Relief from General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is ACCEPTED despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/9/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(smy1)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kristopher G. French. (smy1)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Kristopher G. French. (smy1)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against J. Mitchell (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Kristopher G. French. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1355-MMA-AHG. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: French v. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristopher G. French
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?