Upshaw v. Allison et al
| Andre Upshaw |
| Kathleen Allison, Theresa Cisneros, M. Navarro, A. Gonzalez, J. Hatfield, M. Whitman, B. Hendrick and R. Briggs |
| 3:2022cv01409 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| David D Leshner |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $402, receipt number CAS140884, Paid on 10/3/2022 (smy1) |
Filing 2
ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action without Prejudice for Failing to Satisfy the Required Filing Fee. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/21/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service. IFP Motion sent to Plaintiff.)(sjt)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Kathleen Allison, R. Briggs, Theresa Cisneros, A. Gonzalez, J. Hatfield, B. Hendrick, M. Navarro, M. Whitman (Filing fee $402, fee not paid*, IFP not file.), filed by Andre Upshaw. *Plaintiff sent in a money order for $400 that was returned by Financial due to insufficient amount. Financial did not deliver initiating documents to Clerk's Office until 9/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1409-BTM-DDL. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
