Bennett et al v. Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
| Pamela Bennett and James Bennett |
| Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc., The Judge Law Firm, James Judge and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2022cv01426 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| William Q Hayes |
| John A Houston |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Contract: Marine |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Documents by James Bennett, Pamela Bennett. (cxl1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc., Does 1-10, James Judge, The Judge Law Firm ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CAS140663.), filed by Pamela Bennett, James Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-2, #3 Exhibit 3-15, #4 Exhibit 16-17, #5 Exhibit 18, #6 Exhibit 19-20, #7 Exhibit 21-26, #8 Exhibit 27-28, #9 Receipt)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1426-JAH-KSC. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Bennett, James)(cxl1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
