Neology, Inc. v. Confidex, Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Neology, Inc.
Defendant: Confidex, Ltd., Confidex, Inc., Does 1-20 and Smartrac N.V.
Case Number: 3:2022cv01479
Filed: September 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael S Berg
Referring Judge: Robert S Huie
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 pt Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2022 Filing 14 Neology Inc.'s ANSWER to Amended Crossclaim by Neology, Inc..(Kennedy, Brian)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER finding as moot #12 Motion to Continue Telephonic, attorneys-only Status Conference set for 11/29/2022 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 11/15/2022. (alns)
November 14, 2022 Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Continue the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference by Neology, Inc.. (Kennedy, Brian) (smy1).
November 9, 2022 Filing 11 AMENDED CROSSCLAIM against Neology, Inc., Smartrac N.V., filed by Confidex, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)New Summons Requested. (Finley, Ronald) (alns).
October 31, 2022 Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Confidex, Inc.. (Finley, Ronald) (alns).
October 31, 2022 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Confidex, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Confidex Ou, Corporate Parent Tags Lux s.a.r.l for Confidex, Inc., Confidex, Inc... (Finley, Ronald) (alns).
October 28, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrd)
October 19, 2022 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Neology, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Kennedy, Brian) (alns).
October 19, 2022 Filing 6 Neology Inc.'s ANSWER to #3 Crossclaim of Confidex Inc. Cross-Complaint by Neology, Inc..(Kennedy, Brian) (alns).
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference Early Neutral Evaluation set for 11/29/2022 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg. Case Management Conference set for 11/29/2022 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 10/03/2022.(alns) (jms).
September 30, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *8,237,568*, *8,325,044*, *8,587,436* cc:USPTO (ggv) (sjt).
September 30, 2022 Filing 3 CROSSCLAIM against Neology, Inc., filed by Confidex, Inc., Confidex, Ltd., Neology, Inc. (ggv) (sjt).
September 30, 2022 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Confidex, Inc. (ggv) (sjt).
September 30, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17213605.), filed by Confidex, Inc., Confidex, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1479-RSH-MSB. Judge Robert S. Huie and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(ggv) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neology, Inc. v. Confidex, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neology, Inc.
Represented By: Brian J Kennedy
Represented By: John Christopher Jaczko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Confidex, Ltd.
Represented By: Alfredo A. Bismonte
Represented By: Remington Lenton-Young
Represented By: Ronald Craig Finley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Confidex, Inc.
Represented By: Alfredo A. Bismonte
Represented By: Remington Lenton-Young
Represented By: Ronald Craig Finley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smartrac N.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?