State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
United States of America and Esteban Aviles |
3:2022cv01530 |
October 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Dana M Sabraw |
Andrew G Schopler |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act (Definitions) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. United States of America served. (Anderson, Christopher) (jpp). |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22cv1530-DMS-AGS.(no document attached) (ddf) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (rmc). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Esteban Aviles, United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17235015.), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) The new case number is 3:22-cv-1530-BEN-AGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Anderson, Christopher)(cxl1) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.