Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Maxlinear, Inc.
| Bell Semiconductor, LLC |
| Maxlinear, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01537 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Minute Order by District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro: Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties joint motion for extension of time (Doc. #8 ). Defendant shall respond to the complaint on or before January 9, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 12/2/2022.(alns)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Maxlinear, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Deming, Benjamin)Attorney Benjamin C. Deming added to party Maxlinear, Inc.(pty:dft) (alns). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Maxlinear, Inc. served. (Block, Alan) (ddf). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alan Peter Block on behalf of Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Block, Alan)Attorney Alan Peter Block added to party Bell Semiconductor, LLC(pty:pla) (jpp). |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bell Semiconductor, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Hilco IP Merchant Capital, LLC, Corporate Parent Hilco, Inc., Corporate Parent Hilco Patent Acquisition 56 LLC for Bell Semiconductor, LLC.. (Yukevich, James) (jpp). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR TRADEMARK by Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Yukevich, James) (jpp). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (rmc). |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *7,396,760* cc:USPTO (cxl1) (rmc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Maxlinear, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17236752.), filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1537-RBM-DEB. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Yukevich, James)(cxl1) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Maxlinear, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bell Semiconductor, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Cristina M. Ciminelli |
| Represented By: | James J Yukevich |
| Represented By: | Nina J. Kim |
| Represented By: | Alan Peter Block |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maxlinear, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin C. Deming |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
