Galindo-Amador v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Ada Selene Galindo-Amador |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
3:2022cv01557 |
October 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
David D Leshner |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ada Selene Galindo-Amador (Lawler, Martin) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Mootness) by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Keehn, Douglas)Attorney Douglas Keehn added to party Ur Mendoza Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Douglas Keehn added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft)(jrm). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jms) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $402 - receipt number ACASDC-17242198), filed by Ada Selene Galindo-Amador. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1557-AJB-DDL. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Lawler, Martin)(jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.