GS Holistic, LLC v. Payless Smoke Shop INC et al
GS Holistic, LLC |
Payless Smoke Shop INC doing business as Payless Smoke Shop #2, Nasman H Kiryakous and Sarmad Damman |
3:2022cv01590 |
October 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Allison H Goddard |
Linda Lopez |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 tr Fed. Question: Trademark |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GS Holistic, LLC. Sarmad Damman served. (Leon, Tomas) (ddf). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GS Holistic, LLC. Nasman H Kiryakous served. (Leon, Tomas) (ddf). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GS Holistic, LLC. All Defendants served. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service, #2 Proof of Service)(Leon, Tomas) (ddf). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (anh) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *6,633,884*, *6,174,292*, *6,174,291* cc:USPTO (anh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sarmad Damman, Nasman H Kiryakous, Payless Smoke Shop INC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17254147.), filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1590-LL-AHG. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Leon, Toma)(anh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.