Pena v. GameStop, Inc.
| Vicente Pena |
| GameStop, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01635 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 2511 Wiretapping - Injunctive Relief or Civil Fine |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by GameStop, Inc. and Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. Identifying Corporate Parent Gamestop Corp for GameStop, Inc.. (Hsia, Jui-Ting)(ave).
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Change Venue , Stay or Dismiss by GameStop, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Anna Hsia, #3 Exhibit Table of Contents to Exhibits, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C)(Hsia, Jui-Ting) (ave).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint and Set a Briefing Schedule . Defendant SHALL RESPOND to the Complaint on or before December 6, 2022. To the extent Defendant's response to the Complaint is a motion, Plaintiff Vicente Pena SHALL FILE his opposition on or before January 20, 2023, and Defendant MAY FILE its reply, if any, on or before January 31, 2023. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/16/2022. (fth)
|
|
Filing 6
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint and Set a Briefing Schedule by GameStop, Inc.. (Hsia, Jui-Ting) (alns).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Jui-Ting Anna Hsia on behalf of GameStop, Inc. (Hsia, Jui-Ting)Attorney Jui-Ting Anna Hsia added to party GameStop, Inc.(pty:dft) (alns).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Nelson on behalf of Vicente Pena (Nelson, John)Attorney John J. Nelson added to party Vicente Pena(pty:pla) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vicente Pena. GameStop, Inc. served. (Shay, Daniel) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (rmc).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against GameStop, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17276710.), filed by Vicente Pena. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1635-JLS-RBB. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Swigart, Joshua)(cxl1) (rmc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pena v. GameStop, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vicente Pena | |
| Represented By: | Daniel G. Shay |
| Represented By: | Joshua Brandon Swigart |
| Represented By: | John J. Nelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GameStop, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jui-Ting Anna Hsia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
