Cabrera v. Garland et al
Jesus Manuel Cabrera |
Merrick Garland, Donald W. Washington, Chad Wolf and Steven C. Stafford |
3:2022cv01638 |
October 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Dana M Sabraw |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jesus Manuel Cabrera (Swain-Gil, Sebastian) (jpp). |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22CV1638-DMS.(no document attached) (sjt) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Jesus Manuel Cabrera. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(cxl1) (rmc). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum against Merrick Garland, Steven C. Stafford, Donald W. Washington, Chad Wolf, No Fee Required, filed by Jesus Manuel Cabrera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1638-AJB. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia is assigned to the case. (Swain-Gil, Sebastian)(cxl1) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.