Monges v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Carlos Monges
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 3:2022cv01675
Filed: October 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Daniel E Butcher
Referring Judge: M James Lorenz
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 2/8/2023 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher. Case Management Conference set for 2/8/2023 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher. Joint Discovery Plan due 2/3/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher on 12/22/2022.(cxl1)
December 21, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by The Prudential Insurance Company of America . Identifying Corporate Parent The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Other Affiliate Prudential Financial, Inc. for The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (James, Jason) (cxl1).
December 21, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(James, Jason) (cxl1).
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. No later than December 21, 2022, Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America shall file its response, if any, to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 11/10/2022. (fth)
November 9, 2022 Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (James, Jason)Attorney Jason Aaron James added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft) (fth).
October 28, 2022 Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv)
October 27, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt).
October 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Prudential Insurance Company of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17292883.), filed by Carlos Monges. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1675-L-DEB. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Bonnici, Joshua)(ggv) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monges v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Monges
Represented By: Joshua Michael Bonnici
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Represented By: Jason Aaron James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?