Hawkins v. San Diego Police Department et al
| Christopher Hawkins |
| San Diego Police Department, Devin Bedard, Kevin Petrucelli and Does 1 to 20 |
| 3:2022cv01727 |
| November 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| David D Leshner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) and Dismissing Ciil Action Without Prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 11/7/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Blank IFP form mailed with Order)(anh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Hawkins. (smy1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Devin Bedard, Does 1 to 20, Kevin Petrucelli, San Diego Police Department (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Christopher Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter to Clerk)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1727-CAB-DDL. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
