Molina v. Allison et al
| Andrew S. Molina |
| Kathleen Allison and Xavier Becerra |
| 3:2022cv01733 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 5:22-cv-01986. (smy1) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: * Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*3470 Twelfth Street**Riverside, CA 92501-3801*. Signed by District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 11/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(fth) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew S. Molina. (smy1) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Kathleen Allison, Xavier Becerra (Filing fee $5, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Andrew S. Molina. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Index, #3 Exhibits, #4 Letter to Clerk)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1733-RBM-MSB. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
