Al-Kaissey v. Radel et al
Plaintiff: Qussay Abdulrazzak Al-Kaissey
Defendant: David M. Radel, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland
Case Number: 3:2022cv01772
Filed: November 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Keehn, Douglas) (jmo).
December 22, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT by David M. Radel, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas re #3 Joint MOTION to Stay filed by Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, David M. Radel (joint motion filed in error). (Keehn, Douglas) (jmo).
December 22, 2022 Filing 3 **DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN BY FILERS PER #4 **Joint MOTION to Stay by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Keehn, Douglas)Attorney Douglas Keehn added to party Merrick B. Garland(pty:dft), Attorney Douglas Keehn added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Douglas Keehn added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft) Modified on 12/22/2022 to withdraw (jmo).
November 14, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (rmc).
November 11, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus against Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17337575.), filed by Qussay Abdulrazzak Al-Kaissey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1772-BAS-MDD. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Anzarouth, Alan)(cxl1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Al-Kaissey v. Radel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Qussay Abdulrazzak Al-Kaissey
Represented By: Alan M Anzarouth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David M. Radel
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Douglas Keehn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Douglas Keehn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Douglas Keehn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?