GS Holistic, LLC v. Urban Glass, Inc et al
| GS Holistic, LLC |
| Urban Glass, Inc doing business as Urban Glass Smoke Shop, Staly Azou and Levard Azou |
| 3:2022cv01799 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *6,633,884*, *6,174,292*, *6,174,291* cc:USPTO (cxl1) (rmc). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cxl1) (rmc). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by GS Holistic, LLC. Identifying Other Affiliate Chris Folkerts for GS Holistic, LLC. (cxl1) (rmc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Levard Azou, Staly Azou, Urban Glass, Inc ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17351324.), filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1799-BAS-BGS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Leon, Tomas)(cxl1) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
