Camarena v. Hyundai Motor America et al
Gladis Camarena |
Hyundai Motor America and Does 1 through 10 |
3:2022cv01837 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Bernard G Skomal |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 pl Fed. Question: Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice and Order: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 3/24/2023 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. Joint Discovery Plan due 3/10/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 1/19/2023.(jrm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties by Hyundai Motor America (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hyundai Motor America. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Hyundai Motor America.(Tahsildoost, Soheyl)(jrm). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Dustin Patrick Cantwell on behalf of Gladis Camarena (Cantwell, Dustin)(jrm). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17363706). Filed by Hyundai Motor America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1837-AJB-BGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(sjt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.