Arraut et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al
| Rafael Arraut and Allison Arraut |
| Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2022cv01850 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| David D Leshner |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #2 Notice of Related Case (Carner, Gretchen) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. for Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company.. (Carner, Gretchen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, . (Carner, Gretchen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17368769.), filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-G)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1850-MMA-DDL. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case.(cxl1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
