In Re: Silva
| Raul Silva |
| Guillermo Gomez and Lisandra Gomez |
| 3:2022cv01959 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Todd W Robinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (District or BAP) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Amended Supplement to Transmittal of Appeal and/or Bankruptcy Matter (CSD 1257), Related document: #1 Statement of Election, filed by Raul Silva, #3 Transmittal of Perfected or Unperfected Appeal, Supplement (CSD 1256, 1257, 1258). (Attachments: #1 Designation of Record)(Lewis, L.) |
| Filing 3 Transmittal of Perfected Record on Appeal (CSD 1256), Related document: #2 Transmittal of Perfected or Unperfected Appeal, Supplement (CSD 1256, 1257, 1258), #1 Statement of Election, filed by Raul Silva.(Lewis, L.) |
| Filing 2 Transmittal of Perfected Record on Appeal (CSD 1256), Memorandum Decision(Lewis, L.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT and Statement of Election. Bankruptcy Court case number: 19-04900-LT7. BK Internal Control Appeal Number: 1., filed by Raul Silva. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Referral, #3 Transmital)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1959-TWR-KSC. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (fth) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
