Makely v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Kelly Kay Makely
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 3:2022cv01969
Filed: December 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: David D Leshner
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer is GRANTED. Defendant shall file the Certified Administrative Record and her answer, if any, on or before March 13, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner on February 9, 2023. (no document attached) (kmc)
February 9, 2023 Filing 9 Joint Motion for Extension of Time (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Darcher, Edmund) (exs).
February 2, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Edmund (Jack) Darcher (Darcher, Edmund)
February 1, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Edmund (Jack) Darcher on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Darcher, Edmund)Attorney Edmund (Jack) Darcher added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft) (exs).
January 19, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft) (exs).
December 19, 2022 Filing 5 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Kelly Kay Makely. (mef).
December 13, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate David D. Leshner has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. The Notice of Electronic Filing of the complaint sent by the court to the Commissioner suffices for service of the complaint. The Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (fth)
December 13, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Kelly Kay Makely. No Parties With Financial Interest. (fth)
December 13, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Docket in Error (fth)(jms).
December 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17419905.), filed by Kelly Kay Makely. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1969-DDL. Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner is assigned to the case. (Perales, Monica)(fth) (rmc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Makely v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Kay Makely
Represented By: Monica Perales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Social Security Administration Office of General C
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Edmund Darcher
Represented By: Katherine L. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?