Cantu v. Tapestry, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jesse Cantu
Defendant: Tapestry, Inc. a Maryland corporation doing business as Coach.com and Does 1 through 25
Case Number: 3:2022cv01974
Filed: December 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: David D Leshner
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 pa Right to Privacy Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #10 ) If Plaintiff wishes to do so, he must file a Second Amended Complaint by 7/24/23. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 7/10/23. (jmo)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RESPONSE re #15 Notice (Other) filed by Jesse Cantu. (Ferrell, Scott) (jmo).
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE of Recent Authority by Tapestry, Inc. (Jones, Merrit) (jmo).
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RESPONSE in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Tapestry, Inc.. (Rockey, Daniel) (jmo).
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Jesse Cantu. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of V. Knowles)(Ferrell, Scott) (jmo).
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Granting Joint Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule (ECF No. #9 ). Plaintiff to oppose the motion to dismiss, or request an extension of time to do so, by no later than 3/20/2023. Defendant to reply, or request an extension of time to do so, by no later than 4/3/2023. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 2/27/23. (jmo)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tapestry, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Vanguard Group for Tapestry, Inc. (Rockey, Daniel) (jmo).
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Tapestry, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proposed Order, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(Rockey, Daniel) (jmo).
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Order for Approval of Stipulated Briefing Schedule for Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint by Tapestry, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proposed Order)(Jones, Merrit) **QC mailer on 2/13/2023 - proposed orders are not to be filed on docket and to submit to Chambers** (jmo).
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jesse Cantu. (Ferrell, Scott) (jmo).
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Granting Joint Motion to Extend Defendant's Deadline to Respond (ECF No. #6 ). Defendant to respond to the Complaint by no later than 2/8/2023. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/17/23. (jmo)
January 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Tapestry, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Order)(Jones, Merrit)Attorney Merrit M Jones added to party Tapestry, Inc.(pty:dft) **QC Mailer re: not submitting proposed orders on docket 1/17/2023** (jmo).
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Denying Without Prejudice Joint Motion to Extend Defendant's Deadline to Respond (ECF No. #4 ). Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/13/23. (jmo)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Tapestry, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Order)(Rockey, Daniel)Attorney Daniel Thomas Rockey added to party Tapestry, Inc.(pty:dft) **QC Mailer re not filing proposed orders on docket 1/13/2023 (jmo).
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jesse Cantu. Tapestry, Inc. served. (Ferrell, Scott) (jmo).
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (maq)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1 through 25, Tapestry, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17420776.), filed by Jesse Cantu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1974-BAS-DDL. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Ferrell, Scott)(maq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cantu v. Tapestry, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Cantu
Represented By: Scott J. Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tapestry, Inc. a Maryland corporation doing business as Coach.com
Represented By: Daniel Thomas Rockey
Represented By: Merrit M Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?