Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Craig S. Brown
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 3:2022cv01978
Filed: December 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Referring Judge: Roger T Benitez
2 Judge: Daniel E Butcher
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pd Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Courtney Farrell on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Farrell, Elizabeth)Attorney Elizabeth Courtney Farrell added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft) (anh).
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 2/23/2023 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher. Case Management Conference set for 2/23/2023 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher. Joint Discovery Plan due 2/16/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher on 1/13/2023.(sjt) Modified to correct Judge on 1/13/2023 (sjt).
January 5, 2023 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A... (Wraight, Marquis) (anh).
January 5, 2023 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A..(Wraight, Marquis)Attorney Marquis Wraight added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft) (anh).
December 19, 2022 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22cv1978-CAB-DEB.(no document attached) (ddf)
December 14, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (anh)
December 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 through 10, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17422619.), filed by Craig S. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1978-BEN-DEB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Gettis, David E.C.)(anh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig S. Brown
Represented By: David E.C. Gettis
Represented By: James Martin Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Marquis Wraight
Represented By: Elizabeth Courtney Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?