Johnson v. Constellis et al
| Antonio Johnson |
| Constellis, Centerra Group, LLC and Does 2 through 50 |
| 3:2022cv02066 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1441 FHLB: Financial Inst Reform Receiving Enforcement Act 1989 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Centerra Group, LLC. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service of Def.'s Disclosure Statement)(Sinatra, Suzana) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Centerra Group, LLC. (maq)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego-Central Division, case number 37-2022-00042856-CU-OE-CTL (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17457467.), filed by Centerra Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Suzana Sinatra, #3 Declaration Raymond Gellatly, #4 Request for Judicial Notice by Centerra Group, LLC, #5 Proof of Service of Removal Documents)The new case number is 3:22-cv-2066-W-BGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(maq)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
