Sheikholeslami v. United States Department of State et al
| Seyed Mohammad Saeid Sheikholeslami |
| United States Department of State, Hon. Anthony J. Blinken, Jeffry L. Flake and Does 1-9 |
| 3:2023cv00069 |
| January 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Jeffrey T Miller |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by United States Department of State. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Frakes, Linda)Attorney Linda A Frakes added to party United States Department of State(pty:dft) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony J. Blinken, Does 1-9, Jeffry L. Flake, United States Department of State ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17496161.), filed by Seyed Mohammad Saeid Sheikholeslami. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-69-JM-AHG. Judge Jeffrey T. Miller and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Ardalan, Kaveh)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
