Doe v. County of San Diego et al
| John Doe |
| County of San Diego, Christopher Cadigan, Amber Sprague, Ashley Leblanc and Does 1 to 20 |
| 3:2023cv00251 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint its Entirety, or Alternatively, Portions Thereof by Ashley Leblanc. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proof of Service)(Harrison, Harry)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by County of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendant County of San Diego's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, #2 Proof of Service)(Miyamoto, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Christopher Cadigan, Amber Sprague. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendants Christopher Cadigan and Amber Sprague's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, #2 Proof of Service)(Miyamoto, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER (AGS): The joint motion for an extension of time to respond (ECF #15 ) is granted. Defendants' responses to the First Amended Complaint are now due by April 7, 2023. Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 04/03/2023. (no document attached) (raw)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Appearance of Counsel by Harry W. Harrison on behalf of Ashley Leblanc (Harrison, Harry)Attorney Harry W. Harrison added to party Ashley Leblanc(pty:dft) (jms).
|
|
Filing 15
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Christopher Cadigan, County of San Diego, Amber Sprague. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Miyamoto, Jeffrey) (jms).
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge Janis L. Sammartino is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge Andrew G. Schopler for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv251-AGS-KSC. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/21/23.(aas)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER Denying as Moot #6 and #10 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss the Complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/10/2023. (ave)
|
|
Filing 13
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: ENE/CMC taken off calendar pursuant to Doc. No. 5.(no document attached) (plh)
|
|
Filing 12
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by John Doe. (Hoffman, Steve) (aas).
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Miyamoto on behalf of Christopher Cadigan, County of San Diego, Amber Sprague (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Miyamoto, Jeffrey)Attorney Jeffrey Miyamoto added to party Christopher Cadigan(pty:dft), Attorney Jeffrey Miyamoto added to party County of San Diego(pty:dft), Attorney Jeffrey Miyamoto added to party Amber Sprague(pty:dft) (aas).
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint in Its Entirety, or Alternatively, Portions Thereof by Ashley Leblanc. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Mason, Susan)Attorney Susan Leslie Mason added to party Ashley Leblanc(pty:dft) (aas).
|
|
Filing 9
Good cause appearing, the parties Motion to Continue [Doc. No. 8] is granted. The ENE/CMC have been vacated and will be re-scheduled when the pleadings are set and all parties have answered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 3/7/2023. (no document attached) (plh)
|
|
Filing 8
Joint MOTION to Continue ENE by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Steve Hoffman)(Hoffman, Steve) (aas).
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe. Ashley Leblanc served. (Hoffman, Steve) (ave).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Christopher Cadigan, Amber Sprague. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proof of Service)(Inman, Steven) (ave).
|
|
Filing 5
Notice and Order Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference - Joint Discovery Plan due 3/7/2023, Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2023 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo, Early Neutral Evaluation set for 3/14/2023 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 2/10/2023.(ave)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Christopher Cadigan, Amber Sprague Defendants Proof Of Service Of Notice To Adverse Party And State Court Of Removal Of State Court Action To Federal Court (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Inman, Steven)(ave).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE Of Withdrawal Of Individual Attorney by Christopher Cadigan, County of San Diego, Amber Sprague (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Inman, Steven) (ave).
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by County of San Diego (dim) (anh).
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17571963.), filed by Christopher Cadigan, County of San Diego, Amber Sprague. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Declaration of Service)The new case number is 3:23-cv-251-JLS-KSC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(dim) (anh).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
