Littlejohn v. Gallagher et al
| Maurice D. Littlejohn |
| Trevor Gallagher, Kyle Fitzgerald, Ryan A. Blouin, Michael S. Johnson, Alexander Murphy and Stephen Hickox |
| 3:2023cv00297 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER (1) Recusing from Case and (2) Requesting Reassignment. Judge Janis L. Sammartino is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cynthia Bashant for all further proceedings. The new case number is 3:23-cv-00297-BAS-MDD. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/16/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maurice D. Littlejohn. (smy1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ryan A. Blouin, Kyle Fitzgerald, Trevor Gallagher, Michaels Johnson (Filing fee $ 402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Maurice D. Littlejohn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits)The new case number is 3:23-cv-297-JLS-MDD. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
