Ashford v. Mattar et al
| Burk N. Ashford |
| Lee Mattar also known as Leroy Mattar, the Mattar Family Trust et al doing business as Lee's Automotive, Leroy Mattar, the Mattar Family Trust et al and Does 1-20 |
| 3:2023cv00340 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 mn Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PETITION For Reconsideration Of Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Burk N. Ashford. (Attachments: #1 Motion, #2 Envelope)(alns) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action is dismissed without prejudice. To have the case reopened, no later than April 21, 2023, Plaintiff must either pay the $402 filing fee required to commence this civil action or file a renewed IFP motion that sufficiently shows he is entitled to IFP status. Signed by District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 3/21/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION against Lee Mattar ( Filing fee $ 402 - IFP PENDING), filed by Burk N. Ashford. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:23-cv-340-RBM-JLB. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(aas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
