Pacific Property and Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
Pacific Property and Casualty Company |
Whirlpool Corporation and Does 1 through 50 |
3:2023cv00487 |
March 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Linda Lopez |
Bernard G Skomal |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Williams, Jason) (ddf). |
![]() |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Whirlpool Corporation identifying Corporate Parent PRIMECAP Management Company, Corporate Parent Vanguard Group, Inc., Other Affiliate Whirlpool S.A., Other Affiliate Whirlpool of India, Limited, Other Affiliate Whirlpool China Co., Ltd. for Whirlpool Corporation.. (Galvin, Andrew) (ddf). |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed in San Diego Superior Court before removal by Whirlpool Corporation. (Galvin, Andrew) (ddf). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17675482.), filed by Does 1 through 50, Whirlpool Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 State Court Complaint, #5 ADR Information Package, #6 Notice of Case Assignment, #7 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:23-cv-487-LL-BGS. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(mjw) Modified on 3/17/2023 (mjw). (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.