Richard Caruso v. Encore Capitol Group et al
| Richard Caruso |
| Encore Capitol Group, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Midland Funding, LLC |
| 3:2023cv00573 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| John A Houston |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Caruso, as to Midland Funding, LLC. (smy1) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Caruso, as to Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (smy1) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Caruso, as to Encore Capitol Group. (smy1) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (mjw)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Encore Capitol Group, Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number 144588.), filed by Richard Caruso. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:23-cv-573-JAH-BGS. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(mjw)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
