Debrosse Zimmermann et al v. LeadClient, Inc. et al
Diandra Fu Debrosse Zimmermann and DiCello Levitt LLC |
LeadClient, Inc., Select Justice, LLC, AAL Media, LLC, Justice Here, LLC, Inventive Solutions, LLC and Jonathan Gottfried |
3:2023cv00581 |
March 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Andrew G Schopler |
Nita L Stormes |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Diandra Fu Debrosse Zimmermann, DiCello Levitt LLC. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Randazza, Marc) (ddf). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rmc) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *See Complaint* cc:USPTO (rmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against AAL Media, LLC, Jonathan Gottfried, Inventive Solutions, LLC, Justice Here, LLC, LeadClient, Inc., Select Justice, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17720950.), filed by Diandra Fu Debrosse Zimmermann, DiCello Levitt LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-581-AGS-NLS. Judge Andrew G. Schopler and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case. (Randazza, Marc)(rmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.