Alexander v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Armando J. Alexander |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2023cv00617 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 oc Removal- Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Armando J. Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Cardona-Loya, Octavio) (aas).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Stastny, Douglas) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER following Telephonic Conference. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/24/2023.(jpp)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (mjw)(jrd)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-17736013.), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-617-DMS-BLM. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(mjw)(jrd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
