Kelly v. Arlington et al
| Dolores Kelly |
| Michael Arlington and Crunch base |
| 3:2023cv00695 |
| April 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #4 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel,, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Mail sent to Dolores Kelly. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (aas) |
Filing 4
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Dismissing Action Without Prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a); Denying as moot #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/27/23. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas) (jms).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Dolores Kelly. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dolores Kelly. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Arlington, Crunch base, IFP Filed, filed by Dolores Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-695-JLS-MSB. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Kelly, Dolores)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
