Lopez v. Superior Court of California, San Diego County et al
Plaintiff: Arthur Lopez
Defendant: Superior Court of California, San Diego County and Superior Court of CA
Case Number: 3:2023cv00720
Filed: April 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Daniel E Butcher
Referring Judge: James E Simmons
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2023 Filing 7 USCA Case Number 23-55459 for #6 Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit, filed by Arthur Lopez. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrd)
May 19, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit as to #4 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, by Arthur Lopez. (Filing fee $ 505.00. FEE DUE.) (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals.) (smy1)(jrd)
May 1, 2023 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court Grants Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis, but Dismisses the complaint forfailure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court Denies as Moot Plaintiffs Ex Parte motion for injunctive relief. The case is closed. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service on 5/1/2023) (maq)
April 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: (1) Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; (2) Dismissing Complaint Pursuant to Screening Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(E); and (3) Denying as Moot Ex Parte Application for Injunctive Relief (ECF Nos. #2 , #3 ). Signed by District Judge James E. Simmons, Jr on 4/28/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service on 5/1/2023) (maq)
April 20, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION Ex Parte Application for Injuctive Relief, filed by Arthur Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration, #3 Proof of Service) *Proposed Order sent to chambers* (maq)
April 19, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arthur Lopez. (ggv) (sjt).
April 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Superior Court of CA, Superior Court of California, San Diego County, IFP Filed, filed by Arthur Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-720-JES-DEB. Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Lopez, Arthur)(ggv) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. Superior Court of California, San Diego County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Court of California, San Diego County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Court of CA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?