Alonso v. Quan et al
| Christopher K Alonso |
| William Quan, Poli Flores, Ross, M. Lepe Negrete and Christopher Plourd |
| 3:2023cv00760 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William Q Hayes |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 b Fed. Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 06/21/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cxl1)
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE filed by Christopher K Alonso. (alns) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Case Closed Deadline 6/20/2023.. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/18/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(alns)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher K Alonso. (bdc) (alns). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Christopher K Alonso. (bdc) (alns). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Poli Flores, M. Lepe Negrete, Christopher Plourd, William Quan, Ross, IFP Filed, filed by Christopher K Alonso. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-760-WQH-NLS. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.(bdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
