R2 Solutions LLC v. American Airlines, Inc.
| R2 Solutions LLC |
| American Airlines, Inc. and Teradata Corporation |
| 3:2023cv00842 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Jinsook Ohta |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 pt Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: On 5/8/2023, Petitioner filed a 1 Motion to Compel. On 5/9/2023, Petitioner filed a #3 First Amended Motion to Compel. On 6/20/2023, the parties filed a #20 Joint Motion to Withdraw the First Amended Motion to Compel, informing the Court the underlying case has been resolved. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES AS MOOT Petitioner's 1 Motion to Compel and GRANTS the parties' #20 Joint Motion to Withdraw. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to withdraw Petitioner's #3 First Amended Motion to Compel and close the case. (no document attached) (mjsn)
|
| Filing 20 Joint MOTION to Withdraw #3 R2 Solutions LLC's First Amended Motion to Compel Teradata Corporation to Comply with Document Subpoena (Nelson, Edward) (exs). |
| Filing 19 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17936631.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Lynn, Jamie) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS #10 Teradata Corporation's Motion to File Document Under Seal and #13 R2 Solutions LLC'S Motion to File Document Under Seal. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file UNDER SEAL Teradata Corporation's Opposition lodged at ECF No. 11 and R2 Solutions LLC'S Reply lodged at ECF No. 14. (no document attached) (mjsn)
|
| Filing 15 R2 Solutions LLC's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Teradata Corporation to Comply with Document Subpoena (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Carder W. Brooks, #2 Exhibit 1 (Sealed))(Nelson, Edward) (exs). |
| Filing 14 ***Document Sealed at 18 *** SEALED LODGED Proposed Document re: #13 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Seal is granted. (With attachments)(Nelson, Edward) (exs). Modified to seal on 6/13/2023 (exs). |
| Filing 13 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal (With attachments)(Nelson, Edward) (exs). |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 Amended MOTION to Enforce Out of District Subpoena on Teradata Corporation (Redacted) filed by Teradata Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sarah Guske, #2 Exhibit A (Sealed), #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Guske, Sarah) (exs). |
| Filing 11 ***Document Sealed at ECF 17 ***SEALED LODGED Proposed Document re: #10 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Seal is granted. (With attachments)(Guske, Sarah) (exs). Modified to seal on 6/13/2023 (exs). |
| Filing 10 Teradata Corporation's Unopposed Motion to File Document Under Seal (With attachments)(Guske, Sarah) (exs). |
| Filing 9 PRO HAC APPROVED: Carder W. Brooks appearing for Petitioner R2 Solutions LLC (no document attached) (jrm) |
| Filing 8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17866437.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Brooks, Carder) |
| Filing 7 PRO HAC APPROVED: Edward R Nelson, III, Christopher G. Granaghan appearing for Petitioner R2 Solutions LLC (no document attached) (jrm) |
| Filing 6 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17865295.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Granaghan, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-17865266.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Nelson, Edward)(jrm). |
| Filing 4 Minute Order: On May 8, 2023, Petitioner R2 Solutions LLC (Petitioner) filed a Motion toCompel Teradata Corporation to Comply with Document Subpoena. (ECF No. 1.)On May 9, 2023, Petitioner filed a First Amended Motion to Compel TeradataCorporation to Comply with Document Subpoena. (Amended Mot., ECF No. 3.)Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:1. On or before May 26, 2023, Teradata Corporation shall file and serve anopposition to the Amended Motion. The opposition shall be no more than 10pages, exclusive of exhibits.2. On or before June 2, 2023, Petitioner may file and serve any reply to theopposition. The reply shall be no more than 5 pages, exclusive of exhibits.3. Pursuant to CivLR 7.1(d)(1), this matter will be resolved without oralargument unless otherwise ordered by the Court.4. If any filing exceeds 30 pages, a courtesy copy shall be provided incompliance with II.E of Judge Burkhardts Civil Chambers Rules.5. Each document filed must comply with CivLR 5.1 and V.C. of JudgeBurkhardts Civil Chambers Rules.(exs) |
| Filing 3 R2 Solutions LLC's First Amended Motion to Compel Teradata Corporation to Comply with Document Subpoena (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Carder W. Brooks, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Proposed Order, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hatch, Ryan) (exs). |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Jinsook Ohta for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv842-JO-JLB.(no document attached) (ddf) |
| Filing 1 MOTION To Compel Teradata Corporation To Comply With Document Subpoena by R2 Solutions LLC. (no document attached) (mjw)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
