Fountain Valley Power, LLC v. National Mechanical Services, Inc.
| Fountain Valley Power, LLC |
| National Mechanical Servies, Inc. and National Mechanical Services, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00876 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| David D Leshner |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pd Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fountain Valley Power, LLC. Fountain Valley Power, LLC served. (Kveton, Kyle) (ddf). |
| Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dim) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dim) (anh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against National Mechanical Services, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17843438.), filed by Fountain Valley Power, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-876-BEN-DDL. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Kveton, Kyle)(dim) . (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
