Wang v. Mayorkas et al
| Tingfeng Wang |
| Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland |
| 3:2023cv00893 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Steve B Chu |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 i Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23CV0893-RBM-SBC.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (jpp) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (ggv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 145624.), filed by Tingfeng Wang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Receipt, #4 Envelope)The new case number is 3:23-cv-893-RBM-NLS. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case. (Wang, Tingfeng)(ggv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
