Hendricks v. US Dept of Health and Human Services et al
Latonya Hendricks |
US Dept of Health and Human Services, United States Dept of Agriculture, California Department of Social Services and Colorado Department of Human Services |
3:2023cv01050 |
June 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Robert S Huie |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Denying Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ). Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 7/17/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(alns) |
Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Latonya Hendricks. (alns) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Latonya Hendricks. (mjw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against California Department of Social Services, Colorado Department of Human Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services, United States Dept of Agriculture, IFP Filed, filed by Latonya Hendricks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1050-RSH-BLM. Judge Robert S. Huie and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(mjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.