Fu v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
| Linxi Fu |
| United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS), Ur M. Jaddou, Andrew Davidson and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 3:2023cv01051 |
| June 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William Q Hayes |
| Linda Lopez |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Linxi Fu. All Defendants served. (Zhang, Meixuan) (ddf). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge William Q. Hayes is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Linda Lopez for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23CV1051-LL-BLM.(no document attached) (alns) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mjw)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS), Ur M. Jaddou, Andrew Davidson, Alejandro Mayorkas, (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-17908626.), filed by Linxi Fu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1051-WQH-BLM. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Zhang, Meixuan)(mjw)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
