Connell v. Cox Communications California, LLC et al
| Marc Connell |
| Cox Communications California, LLC and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 3:2023cv01062 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| David D Leshner |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Defendant Cox Communications California, LLC's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul Berkowitz In Support of Opposition to Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration of Luis A. Avila In Support of Opposition to Motion to Remand)(Berkowitz, Paul) (exs). |
Filing 11
ORDER Terminating #9 Motion to Remand as Moot. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/17/2023. (exs)
|
| Filing 10 Minute Order Vacating Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference (ENE/CMC). The Court hereby VACATES the August 11, 2023 ENE/CMC. The ENE/CMC will be reset, if necessary, following the District Court's disposition of the motion to remand. (no document attached) (src) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's Re-Notice of Motion for Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Marc Connell, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit 1 - Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Unverified Complaint, #5 Exhibit 2 - Statement of Information)(Belong, Tyler) (exs). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Resetting Hearing on #6 Plaintiff's Motion for Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/13/2023.(exs)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Devin S. Lindsay on behalf of Cox Communications California, LLC (Lindsay, Devin)Attorney Devin S. Lindsay added to party Cox Communications California, LLC(pty:dft) (exs). |
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's Motion for Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities In Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Marc Connell, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit 1 Def's Answer to Plaintiff's Unverified Complaint, #5 Exhibit 2 Statement of Information)(Belong, Tyler) (exs). |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference: Early Neutral Evaluation set for 8/11/2023 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner. Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2023 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner. Joint Discovery Plan due 7/28/2023. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 6/7/2023.(exs)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Cox Communications California, LLC. Identifying Corporate Parent Cox Communications, Inc. for Cox Communications California, LLC. (mjw)(jrd) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cox Communications California, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Cox Enterprises, Inc. for Cox Communications California, LLC. (mjw)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Cox Communications California, LLC. (mjw)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-17912452.), filed by Cox Communications California, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1062-W-DDL. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case.(mjw)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
