Maleka-Ndandu v. Elite Show Services, Inc. et al.
| Tresor Maleka-Ndandu |
| Elite Show Services, Inc. and Elite Security, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01100 |
| June 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order (1) Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Puaperis; (ECF No. #2 ) (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint for Failure to State a Claim; (3) Denying Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #3 ). Any amended filings must be made within 30 days of the date of this Order or else the case will be closed without further opportunity to amend. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/18/23. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Tresor Maleka-Ndandu. (ggv) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tresor Maleka-Ndandu. (ggv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Elite Show Services, Inc., IFP Filed, filed by Tresor Maleka-Ndandu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1100-GPC-JLB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Maleka-Ndandu, Tresor)(ggv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
