OSRX, Inc. et al v. Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C. et al
Petitioner: OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc.
Respondent: Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C. and Karla L. Palmer
Case Number: 3:2023cv01131
Filed: June 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Jill L Burkhardt
2 Judge: David D Leshner
3 Judge: Thomas J Whelan
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by OSRX, Inc., Ocular Science, Inc. re #9 MOTION Objecting to Magistrate Judge's Ruling on Petition to Compel Compliance With Subpoenas , #8 Notice of Appearance (Liddiard, Dylan) (jmo).
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION Objecting to Magistrate Judge's Ruling on Petition to Compel Compliance With Subpoenas by OSRX, Inc., Ocular Science, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Thomas J. Martin)(Liddiard, Dylan) **QC mailer 8/1/23 reminding about captioning document correctly with dates** (jmo).
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Dylan J. Liddiard on behalf of OSRX, Inc., Ocular Science, Inc. (Liddiard, Dylan)Attorney Dylan J. Liddiard added to party OSRX, Inc.(pty:pet), Attorney Dylan J. Liddiard added to party Ocular Science, Inc.(pty:pet) (jmo).
July 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: the Petition to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas is DENIED. The case is hereby closed.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
July 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Denying Petition to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas (Dkt. No. #1 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner on 7/17/23.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo) (Main Document 6 replaced on 7/20/2023 to add stamp and regenerate NEF) (jmo).
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Report of Clerk and Order of Transfer Pursuant to "Low Number" Rule: Judge Thomas J. Whelan, Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv01131-BAS-DDL. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/5/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(exs)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt assigned to transfer case from District of Columbia. (no document attached) (jpp)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:23-mc-00057. Original file received electronically
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of #1 Petition to Compel Compliance with Subpoena and Transfer Adjudication of All Compliance-Related Issues to S.D. Cal., it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to transfer, to which all parties consent, is GRANTED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(f). It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall transfer this action and all issues relating to enforcement of the third-party subpoenas to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, where the underlying action is pending. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 6/5/2023. (lcrjl3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 6/16/2023.]
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., OSRX, INC. (zjm) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 6/16/2023.]
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena and Transfer Adjudication of all Compliance-Related Issues to S.D. cal. by OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., OSRX, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(zjm) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 6/16/2023.]
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing fee received: $ 49, receipt number: 204750. (zjm) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 6/16/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OSRX, Inc. et al v. Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: OSRX, Inc.
Represented By: Vanessa Destime
Represented By: Dylan J. Liddiard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ocular Science, Inc.
Represented By: Vanessa Destime
Represented By: Dylan J. Liddiard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Karla L. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?