Gamble III v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office
| John E. Gamble III |
| U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office |
| 3:2023cv01146 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Allison H Goddard |
| William Q Hayes |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0552 fi Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Glover-Rogers, Mary) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office answer due 8/21/2023.. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/24/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(alns)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Glover-Rogers, Mary)Attorney Mary Tommicile Glover-Rogers added to party U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office(pty:dft) (alns). |
| Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (dim) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (dim) (anh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 146346.), filed by John E. Gamble III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachments 1-8, #3 Receipt)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1146-WQH-AHG. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case.(dim) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gamble III v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John E. Gamble III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Freedom of Information Act Office | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Represented By: | Mary Tommicile Glover-Rogers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
